Divine foreknowledge and human freedom: exploring a gap-theoretic account

Abstract The recent work of logician Jc Beall marks a paradigm shift within the fields analytic theology and philosophy religion. Thanks to Beall’s work, long held (and generally unquestioned) assumption that is governed by (or closed under) classical account logic, no longer free for assumption. More importantly, dropping this unquestioned commitment account, has uncovered natural well-motivated solutions some monotheistic theologies’ most difficult longstanding problems. That said, much others who have followed his lead) been paraconsistent, utilizing glut-theoretic (contradictory) models solve theologies In essay, my plan go paracomplete, with aim exploring yet be explored solution infamous foreknowledge freedom problem. My finds its roots in Aaron Cotnoir (‘God Gaps’, Analysis , 2017). Specifically, essay I will explore gap-theoretic problem; one which it neither true nor false God foreknowledge. By Cotnoir’s model — sees limit claims on God’s omni-properties as either just or gappy problem emerges. Moreover, Beall-Cotnoir model, not only circumvented, but an interesting novel divine omniscience